Bill C-293 + Bill 332
Ways to help:
Click here to use my letter template and write to the Senate.
My previous videos:
https://www.instagram.com/the.rkh/reel/DBkSTiPyg3t/
https://www.instagram.com/the.rkh/reel/DBhtGkgSi5d/
Bill C-293, known as the Pandemic Prevention and Preparedness Act, aims to enhance Canada’s readiness for future pandemics. Passed in the House of Commons in June 2024, it mandates the Health Minister to develop a national plan, coordinate efforts across multiple government agencies, and implement a "One Health" approach. This approach, endorsed by the World Health Organization, integrates human, animal, and environmental health to address pandemic risks comprehensively. The legislation also adds a national pandemic coordinator position within the Public Health Agency of Canada to oversee these preparations.
One significant point of debate is the removal of a requirement for an independent advisory committee to assess Canada’s response to COVID-19. The initial proposal called for such a committee to analyze past actions and inform future policies, but this was amended, leaving pandemic oversight primarily within the federal government. Critics argue that without independent oversight, the legislation may lack the transparency needed to fully address public concerns and prevent issues experienced during COVID-19.
Some opposition parties, particularly the Conservatives and Bloc Quebecois, voted against the bill, citing concerns about accountability and potential government overreach. They argue that Canada already has mechanisms for emergency response and that a more detailed public inquiry into the COVID-19 response would provide a stronger foundation for future planning
As the bill is now under Senate review, further debate may lead to modifications, which could address concerns about transparency and the potential impact of the "One Health" approach on sectors like agriculture and trade.
My thoughts:
I have made it clear that I do not agree with this bill. There was already overreach, who says that it will not happen again? How can we determine what the threshold for an invocation of this act is? Ie: what are their guidelines for enforcement?
We saw that the use of the Emergencies Act was unconstitutional and voted as such. This bill would give the right (if passed after the third reading still pending), to “subject” Canadians to the same, and maybe more, restrictions to limit movement, travel , industry, and vocation.
If you didn’t like your job being impacted then – you won’t like it now either.
There is the question about whether Canadians would listen. There is no guarantee. On a spiritual level, we have surpassed the threshold of apathy and ignorance to these things.
People are no longer accepting what they used to. There would likely be less of a “blind following” – whether that comes to “the v”, masks, or exiting any style of social setting.
The lasting impacts of the “plandemic” as I call it, is going to take decades to fix. The mental damage and developmental delays for the younger generation(s) is not something that the government is going to fund help for.
How much are Canadians willing to tolerate?
It is in our hands to do something about it.
Ways to help:
Click here to use my letter template and write to the Senate.
My previous videos:
https://www.instagram.com/the.rkh/reel/DBkSTiPyg3t/
https://www.instagram.com/the.rkh/reel/DBhtGkgSi5d/
Bill 332
Bill 332 – a potential amendment to the Criminal Code to include coercive control.
Bill C-332, currently under review in Canada’s legislative process, proposes to address and criminalize “coercive and controlling” behavior within intimate relationships. This bill, introduced by NDP MP Laurel Collins, is part of a broader push to recognize non-physical forms of abuse, which often precede or accompany physical violence. By amending the Criminal Code, the bill aims to provide legal recourse for victims experiencing various forms of psychological control, manipulation, and isolation from partners. Such behaviors might include financial control, restricting social interactions, and instilling fear, all of which can severely impact a person’s mental health and overall well-being.
Inspired in part by similar laws in the UK, where the criminalization of coercive control led to a notable increase in domestic abuse reporting, Bill C-332 has garnered cross-party support in Canada’s House of Commons. Advocates emphasize that this legislative measure is essential for empowering victims and enabling earlier intervention in abusive situations. However, some critics argue that implementing and enforcing these laws may be challenging and that additional investments in community resources, such as shelters and counseling, are crucial for comprehensive support to survivors.
This bill follows the recently passed Bill C-233, also known as Keira’s Law, which mandates education for judges on intimate partner violence (IPV). Together, these legislative efforts reflect a growing recognition of the complexities of IPV and the need to prevent escalation by addressing psychological abuse.
Bill C-332 has already passed its second reading in the House and awaits further consideration in the Senate. Should it become law, it would mark a significant step in Canada’s efforts to combat domestic abuse and provide protection for victims before physical violence occurs.
My Thoughts:
I have nothing negative to say about this. As a victim, lawyer, and advocate – this is the law that WE NEED in our systems. It is still uncertain whether the B.C. courts will rule affirming psychological and emotional abuse as a consideration in divorce proceedings. They are still actively considering this – I am hopeful for new precedent.
Giving Canadians criminal recourse is going to change the trajectory of what is seen as socially acceptable and tolerable.
This is a part of the fall of the patriarchy that we are currently facing. A lot of abuse and mindsets have been passed down generationally.
All of the work that we have done to heal ourselves through the generations, is going to create more accountability and resources.